Sep 14 2006

Diary of a Plus Size Blogger - The Fat Tax

Fat tax, also known as “Twinkie tax”, “junk food tax,” and “snack tax,” is a tax on calorie-dense, nutrient-poor foods. The tax has been proposed as one means to address the obesity problem. The consumption of junk food is supposed to decline if it becomes more expensive. The revenue from the tax would be used to promote healthy nutrition and anti-obesity programs.

I have never liked the title nor the definition of this particular bill that was proposed in Congress in the 1980’s to address obesity concerns in America, and to supposedly get American’s to eat more healthy and exercise. One of the things that is most disturbing about this tax is the fact that the government is looking to do things to directly affect the choice that a person makes about how and what they eat.

“The people shouldn’t be afraid of there government, the government should be afraid of its people” from the movie V for Vendetta

The government has no right to put a tax on food items and try to make people believe that the money is going to be used in health and nutrition. Why can’t some of the billions that are spent each year on frivolous items go towards funding programs that will help all American’s regardless of size? I guess that makes too much sense.

I know those of you that are regular readers of Full Figure Plus are wondering what does this have to do with clothing and accessories. It’s a well established fact that buying plus size clothing in any store in this country that there is a mark up on larger sizes. Why is this? The clothing industry has held on to the notion for years that they use more fabric for plus sizes, and they are not in that much of a demand so they have to charge more to make the same profit they would on smaller sizes. Thus the birth of the “fat tax” in the world of fashion.

Specialty merchants such as IGIGI or Monif C. Plus Sizes in there own way fight back against this tax by carrying clothes for larger sizes period. When you get to merchants such as LL Bean then you will encounter the fat tax in a big way because some merchants are still slow to carry plus sizes at an affordable price.

I have always wondered why larger sizes where more expensive, but at the same time until I started blogging about size discrimination I didn’t think of it the way that I do now. As a man I don’t encounter it that much but it still happens. I can certainly empathize with the plight of ladies having to pay more for an item than smaller ladies; becasue manufacturers still don’t fully understand the plus size shape. Instead of taking a pattern that is made for a size 12 and making it into a size 20 there should be patterns made for a size 20.  If patterns are made in this way from the beginning then there will be no need to charge more becasue the clothing will be made and no guess work involved.
Plus size men and women should have to pay more becasue of there size when it comes to clothing, airline seats, health care or any other thing that is out there and available to the public. The fat tax be it in the clothing industry or in the government arena is a very flawed system that is in serious need of a makeover.

To become one of the Plus Size beauties of the week submit your photos to beautyoftheweek@fullfigureplus.com
Check out the Ulitmate Shopping list for more shopping bargains!
TAGS:

3 Comments on this post

Trackbacks

  1. RoseCampion said:

    As far as an actual ‘fat tax’ on food, this would be very discriminatory towards those living in certain city neighborhoods. I know that here in Chicago, and probably in most other cities, there are big areas that have no ‘real’ grocery store for miles around. Getting to a real grocery store can be a several hour ordeal with a long bus ride, because a lot of city people don’t have a car. So, they go shopping at small local convenience stores, which tend to be stocked with things that won’t spoil, like chips, and less stocked with things that go bad, like fresh fruit and vegetables. I think alot of the people in power in this country forget that access to healthy food in this country is a privelege. One that a lot of people don’t have.

    As for the ‘fat tax’ on clothes. This has always bugged me tons. I sew and I know from experience that the difference in the amount of fabric in an average dress or shirt from size 16 to size 20 or 22 is maybe a quarter yard. But one size might be a ‘regular’ size and therefore, as much as ten dollars cheaper. We always called this price difference the “fat surcharge”, but its the same thing.

    September 14th, 2006 at 3:54 pm
  2. The Nourisher said:

    Some crazy American came over to Australia singing the same song.
    Here’s what I had to say about that.

    http://www.nourished.com.au/articles/obesity-what-to-do

    blessings

    September 15th, 2006 at 6:07 am
  3. Glen L Johnson said:

    I agree with you Rose that grocery stores in the inner city are becoming more and more rare while convience stores are opening all the time. It’s quite the problem that really needs to be fixed.

    I would love to see clothing manufacturers not wimp out when it comes to the price point larger sizes but i won’t hold my breath.

    Nourisher, I’m not sure what you mean by your comment but after ready your blog I can say that providing healthy choices for your family is a great thing, but has little to do with the legislation that is being suggested.

    September 15th, 2006 at 9:06 am

LEAVE A COMMENT

Subscribe Form

Subscribe to Blog

Plus Size Partners

Plus Size Beauty of The Week


|Creative Commons License
| Shopping Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory